By  Barbara Forrest

The year 2011 is about to end, and this gives the Louisiana Coalition for Science (LCFS) a chance to highlight two cool things:  (1) a new article by LCFS member Dr. Ian Binns entitled “Battle over Science in Louisiana” published in (2) Reports of the National Center for Science Education (RNCSE, pronounced “rensee”), which is now freely available online. (The Binns article is here [pdf].) Until recently, Dr. Binns was a science educator at Louisiana State University; he is now at the University of North Carolina-Charlotte. Throughout 2010-2011, he was an integral participant in LCFS’s successful effort to protect the selection of state-approved biology textbooks, and he took the lead in our successful effort to block the passage of HB 580, which would have undermined state oversight of school districts’ purchase of science materials. In the November-December 2011 issue of RNCSE, Dr. Binns has chronicled the attack on science education that took place after the passage of the Louisiana Science Education Act (LSEA).

Dr. Binns’s involvement with LCFS’s efforts to protect science education in Louisiana has enabled him to provide a firsthand account of what happened in the wake of the attempt by the Louisiana Family Forum (LFF) to undermine public school science education (see here, here, here, and here), an effort in which the LFF has benefited from its close alliance with Bobby Jindal:

[T]his article will focus on several events that started in September 2010 and ended in June 2011 and use those events as evidence for the continued attempts by the Louisiana Family Forum (LFF), the state affiliate of the religious right organization Focus on the Family, and others to redefine science in order to serve their narrow agenda.

Among other things, Binns focuses on the LFF’s attack on the textbook selection process, an attack that was centered around the LFF’s effort to change the definition of science: “Since this process was open to public comments, it provided another opportunity for opponents to attempt to redefine science.” If the LFF had got its way, science would have been redefined to include the supernatural. LFF operatives also used the same tactic of trying to disguise their creationism that they used in promoting the LSEA in 2008:

The main players [who submitted public comments on the textbooks that were recommended by the Textbook Review Committee], led by Darrell White, never mentioned anything about creationism or intelligent design’. Instead, they focused on what they called the ‘weaknesses of evolution’. [hyperlink added]

The LFF failed to stop the approval of the books at the level of the Textbook Review Committee, so they next focused on the Textbook/Media/Library Advisory Council, which also decided to review the books despite not having met in almost a decade. Binns also focuses on the LFF’s attempt to derail the selection process at the council’s November 12, 2010, meeting:

From this meeting, I was mostly interested in the documents that were distributed by Lennie Ditoro, a supporter of the LFF, during her testimony. Lennie Ditoro worked with the LFF during the previous science textbook adoption in 2002 and has introduced herself as a representative of the LFF Education Resource Council on at least one occasion. [hyperlinks added]

Ditoro distributed a document that misquoted the 1997 Louisiana Science Framework (LSF) [pdf]. In a subtle distortion of the original wording of the LSF, her handout defined science as a “continuing process for extending understanding of the ultimate, unalterable truth,” a definition that reflects Ditoro’s ignorance of the way science actually works (it does not deal with “ultimate, unalterable truth”).

Binns also discusses Ditoro’s involvement in the 2011 effort that Zack Kopplin led to repeal the LSEA. Continuing her emphasis on redefining science, she testified at the Senate Education Committee hearing for Senator Karen Carter Peterson’s SB 70, which would have repealed the LSEA in its entirety if the committee had not deferred action, in effect killing the bill.

Dr. Binns’s article [pdf] is well worth a read. Louisiana citizens should begin the new year with an understanding of the tactics of the state’s leading anti-science organization. The LFF will surely launch future efforts to undermine public school science education. The 2012 legislative session [pdf] is less than three months away. Jindal will be in office for four more years, and he and the LFF are joined at the hip.

By Barbara Forrest

Many teachers and administrators in Louisiana public schools — and probably some students and parents, too — may be wondering what science teachers are required to do under the terms of the creationist Louisiana Science Education Act (LSEA), which became law with Bobby Jindal’s signature in June 2008.  The law and the implementation policy adopted by the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) allow teachers to bring creationist materials into their classrooms and use them until they get caught doing it. We know that the law permits this because (a) Sen. Ben Nevers, the bill’s sponsor, said so, and (b) the Louisiana Family Forum (LFF) successfully lobbied BESE to delete the prohibitions against teaching creationism from the policy that implements the law. So evolution, the “origins of life,” global warming, and human cloning are all fair game in science classrooms. So now, with the law on the books, what do teachers have to do as a result? Here, after three years, is the definitive answer:

NOTHING.

NOT A SINGLE, ITTY BITTY THING.

The bill permits using creationist supplements, but it does not require teachers to do anything. Nada. Zilch. Zero. Zip.

Teachers do not have to do a single thing differently than they were doing before this ridiculous law was passed. Before the LSEA was passed, teachers were required to teach science according to the Louisiana Content Standards (pdf) and Grade Level Expectations. That’s what they are required to do today. Just teach science properly, and let the creationists stew in their own juices. And please contact the Louisiana Science Coalition if there are any problems. We’re here to help.

Please pass it on.

By Barbara Forrest

The December 28 Baton Rouge Advocate ran a very nice editorial about Zachary Kopplin’s contribution to the Louisiana Coalition for Science’s successful effort to secure approval of biology textbooks for Louisiana public schools on December 7.

The newest giant-killer in state education policy? A 17-year-old student from Baton Rouge High School, who became the spokesman against new efforts to attack the theory of evolution. . . .

Enter Zack Kopplin, an earnest student who campaigned for sound science and against neo-creationism in schools. Kopplin had some help. Members of BESE were contacted by many people who want Louisiana students to learn the facts of science, not the [Louisiana] Family Forum’s mumbo-jumbo.

But the part that attracted Louisiana Family Forum (LFF) executive director Rev. Gene Mills’s attention was the editorial’s brief reference to his organization.

In an end-of-the-year fund-raising campaign to persuade donors to supply the LFF with cash, Rev. Mills seized upon the Advocate‘s reference to the LFF (with emphasis added here):

Young Kopplin’s earnest and articulate defense of science against the Family Forum, headed by the Rev. Gene Mills, one of the most powerful influences in the State Capitol these days.

Rev. Mills clearly relishes the power that he and the LFF have cultivated down at the Capitol, and he is frantically trying to raise money before the end of 2010 for the LFF’s “Ignite” campaign, which will begin in 2011 and is a transparent plan to capitalize on that power. The purpose of this campaign is, in Mills’s words, to “To Fan the Embers that remain from the November [2010] elections into a flame that burns for generations to come.”

Potential donors can review a brochure of the plan [pdf] before they pony up in order, as Rev. Mills says in the brochure, to help the LFF “transform the culture.” His appeal becomes even more explicit, stating that the intent is to re-engage the people of Louisiana in the “culture war.”

LFF’s capacity to work in all three areas of the culture war is a unique asset that fully-leverages Covenant relationships between Policy Makers, Pastors and an Informed Public.

The three areas of the culture war that Rev. Mills hopes to expand in Louisiana — if he gets the money — are (1) the preparation of pastors and young people who are “grounded in a biblical worldview” (budget $125,000), (2) efforts to “engage the faith community across Louisiana” to advocate for “the traditional family” down at the legislature ($75,000), and (3) and a plan to hold elected officials accountable for doing what the LFF wants by distributing “250,000 voter guides” and enlisting “1500 pastors and churches” to help ($75,000).

Mills is getting some assistance in this campaign from a well-known ally who contributed an endorsement to the Ignite brochure:

LFF had another great year, scoring an impressive 31 legislative victories. Gene and his entire group do a great a job day after day, month after month, year after year showing up on behalf of Louisiana’s families. We look forward to many more pro-life, pro-family victories in the years ahead.  —  Bobby Jindal, Governor of Louisiana, 9-23-2010

In his effort to get LFF supporters to part with some tax-deductible cash, Rev. Mills has been sending out a rapid-fire series of frenetic fund-raising e-mails in which he exploits the Louisiana Coalition for Science (LCFS) and the Advocate‘s editorial about Zack. On December 28, after signing off on one such e-mail to his supporters, he linked to the editorial, ignoring (of course) the nice comments about Zack but pointing to one statement that he liked:

P.S.  I’ve uploaded a pdf of the Ignite plan in case you want to review it again.  Click here to download it now

P.S.S.  The ‘biased’ Advocate editorial gets one thing right and calls LFF, ‘One of the most powerful influences at the Capitol these days.’

Only the day before, he had sent out an e-mail that placed the Louisiana Coalition for Science in the same league as some pretty hefty national organizations in terms of what we might do to stop the LFF from saving civilization. He linked to the LCFS “Merry Kitzmas” post of December 20, which warned our readers that “The Louisiana Family Forum is not going to shrink away after one defeat. They’ll be back next year, making mischief again with the help of the Discovery Institute.”

Your support is mission critical to LFF. Ignite is one of the most aggressive campaigns LFF has undertaken.  It’s designed to turn the moment that was the 2010 elections into a movement that touches the legislature, Louisiana elections and the next generation of  youth leadership.  (Click here to download a pdf of the plan today). . . . Groups like ‘Louisiana Coalition for Science,’ Moveon.org, and the ACLU will invest heavily to prevent LFF from igniting that transformation.

Well, now, this is interesting. We have no idea what Moveon.org and the ACLU might be planning to invest to thwart the LFF, but we know exactly what the LCFS has invested so far and plans to invest in the future. And a comparison of our revenue with the LFF’s as shown in its most recently available financial information is quite informative (see the 2008 LFF IRS 990 report [pdf]). Here it is:

Louisiana Family Forum Total Revenue 2008:  $691,915

Louisiana Coalition for Science Total Revenue 2008 (and 2009, 2010, 2011, and the foreseeable future):  $0.00

The LFF’s 2008 IRS 990 report (p. 24) — for the year in which it championed the Louisiana Science Education Act — indicates that this organization spent $123,926.00 — 18% of its total revenue — just on newsletters. That’s a nice little chunk of change. However, the LFF “Ignite” brochure says this (cue the violins):

LFF takes financial stewardship seriously and chooses not to spend thousands of dollars on advertising like organizations such as Planned Parenthood and the ACLU. LFF relies on its supporters to spread the word, so please be sure to tell your family, friends, and church leaders about how LFF is working to ignite an enduring cultural transformation in Louisiana.

And then there’s this additional affirmation:

LFF does not accept government funding and, therefore, depends entirely on the generosity of donors to do its work.

This disavowal implies that the government makes funding available that the LFF nobly declines. But the truth is that, as a 501(c)3 non-profit entity, the LFF certainly accepts its government tax exemption, which is, in effect, money in the bank. And speaking of money in the bank, Rev. Mills is not bashful when it comes to asking for donations, even from senior citizens, as his December 29 fund-raising e-mail demonstrates:

IRA Distributions: The tax law signed on December 17, 2010, allows taxpayers age 70 or older to donate up to $100,000 of the annual required minimum distributions from their IRAs directly to a charity for both 2010 and 2011. The amount of the charitable contribution can be excluded from your taxable income.

Here, for the edification of our readers, is the truth about the Louisiana Coalition for Science’s investment to stop the LFF from exploiting public education in its “culture war”: the only thing we have to invest is the hard-earned expertise and the invaluable personal and professional time (and sometimes personal funds) of our relative handful of volunteers. And, unlike the LFF, since we are unincorporated, we don’t enjoy a federal tax exemption.

We don’t really expect the Louisiana Family Forum to congratulate Zack Kopplin and the LCFS on our victory for Louisiana science education at the BESE meeting on December 7. Nor do we begrudge the LFF its efforts to raise money. They have the freedom in our democratic system to do this, and all non-profits need donors who provide financial support. But a little more class would be very becoming to that organization.

By Barbara Forrest

It’s Kitzmastime! Today, December 20, marks the fifth anniversary of the victory for science education and the Constitution in the case of Kitzmiller et al. v. Dover Area School District (2005). As a result of the ruling [pdf] in favor of the plaintiffs delivered by Judge John E. Jones III, we now have a landmark legal opinion that will serve as the resource of first resort for the judge in the next case stirred up either by the creationists at the Discovery Institute or their foot soldiers in Whereverville, USA. This notable pre-Christmas holiday comes on the heels of a victory for science education in Louisiana: the decision by the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education to approve new high school biology textbooks for public schools. To celebrate both this local victory and the Kitzmastide anniversary, the Louisiana Coalition for Science has an inspirational Kitzmas present for you.

On December 7, fifteen Louisiana citizens stepped into the spotlight to ask the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) to approve new high school biology textbooks for public schools. Spurred by its success at getting the Louisiana Science Education Act (LSEA) passed in 2008, and then its subsequent success at gaining control over BESE policies governing the implementation of the LSEA (see here and here), the Louisiana Family Forum (LFF) then went after the biology textbooks. But this time, the LFF lost. BESE approved the textbooks, first at a meeting of the Student/School Support and Performance Committee meeting on December 7, and again at the general board meeting on December 9. The students of Louisiana who depend on public schools won this round.

What made the difference this time? The difference this time was that pro-science citizens had time and momentum on our side. Thanks to the vigilance of the Baton Rouge Advocate in bringing to public attention the LFF’s attack on the textbooks, and thanks to an organic swell of activism by citizens who were concerned enough to sacrifice their time in order to fight it, the LFF was stopped in its tracks.

Every one of the citizens and students who testified in favor of the textbooks on December 7 had to sacrifice valuable work and study time — not to mention personal time — in order to get involved. Professors and students were in the middle of final exams. Public school teachers had to use their personal days. Scientists and other professionals had to let important work sit while they attended the meeting. Clergy had to disrupt their busy schedules so that BESE members could hear a religious voice in support of good science education rather than only the LFF’s voice attacking it. The Louisiana Science Teachers Association President Shannon Lafont attended the meeting and read a statement from the LSTA.

We also had help in the form of citizen alerts sent out by the Louisiana ACLU and the Forum for Equality, for which we are most grateful. In addition, the Biotechnology Institute in Washington, DC, sent a letter of support that was distributed to BESE members during the meeting. And, as they always do, the National Center for Science Education rendered invaluable assistance.

National media were covering the issue as well — such as John Farrell’s article for Forbes, a national business publication. Lauri Lebo, whose reputation as a fine journalist was sealed with her coverage of the Kitzmiller trial and subsequent book, was covering it on her Religion Dispatches blog.

But ultimately, the credit goes to the Louisiana citizens who showed up at that BESE meeting, both those who testified and those who were in the audience as a show of moral support. After so much negative publicity about Louisiana — much of it well-deserved, unfortunately — the nation now needs to hear the voices of the wonderful citizens who gave their time to show up and speak out.

At this point, you are probably wondering, “So where’s my Kitzmas present?” Here it is: a downloadable collection [pdf] of the testimony of these citizens compiled for your reading pleasure and inspiration. We offer an excerpt from the introduction:

The testimony presented here is a testament to the quality and dedication of the students, teachers, scientists, and concerned citizens who made their voices heard in this effort. However, although we succeeded on December 7, several decades of history have taught us that creationists never take no for an answer. They never give up their efforts to force their particular religious agenda into the classrooms — and into the minds — of our young people. In order to make sure that Louisiana students get the education they deserve and that the religious freedom of every student is respected, the people of Louisiana — parents, teachers and professors, scientists, the business community, clergy, and concerned citizens — who want children properly educated must make their voices heard and must back up their words with actions. The Louisiana Coalition for Science invites them to join us in this effort.

There will be a next time. The Louisiana Family Forum is not going to shrink away after one defeat. They’ll be back next year, making mischief again with the help of the Discovery Institute. And the Louisiana Coalition for Science will again need the help of citizens who value both good science education and the constitutional separation of church and state. We will need eyes and ears in every area of Louisiana. We will need people to contact their legislators to help in Zachary Kopplin’s effort to repeal the LSEA. And we are going to ask you for this help.

So settle in with some hot chocolate beside your Christmas tree and read this collection of testimony from your fellow Louisianians who cared enough to get involved. Oh, and one more thing . . .

HO, HO, HO! MERRY KITZMAS!

By Barbara Forrest

There are times when the irony of life is so thick that one has to just stand back and marvel at it. Now is one of those times in Louisiana. June 25, 2010, marked exactly two years to the day since Gov. Bobby Jindal signed the creationist Louisiana Science Education Act (LSEA). Now, with coastal wildlife trapped and dying in sludge, with the human beings of the Gulf Coast facing the loss of culture, livelihoods, and our beautiful wetlands — courtesy of BP — Gov. Jindal felt called to set aside June 27 as an official day of prayer for divine assistance in “persevering” through this mess — and to post the call to prayer on his official state website. In 2008, his constituents couldn’t even get him to acknowledge the letters he got from scientists and citizens who asked him to veto the LSEA. But now, with the Gulf of Mexico hemorrhaging oil, he was only too happy to sign an official proclamation declaring a “Statewide Day of Prayer for Perseverance Through Oil Spill Crisis” [pdf]. The irony of this is as thick as the oil in the Gulf.

UPDATE, June 29, 2010: Hat tip to Bill Berkowitz in his guest commentary for Buzzflash.com, “Praying Away the Oil, BP’s Oil-Spewing Disaster: It’s God’s Message to America, Conservative Christian Evangelicals Say.” Berkowitz seems to have found the explanation for the official prayer vigil on June 27 at Charisma Magazine‘s News Online: “Governors Declare Day of Prayer for Gulf Spill.” The Charisma article confirms that David Barton drafted the basic prayer proclamation, which the governors of Texas, Louisiana, Alabama, and Mississippi could adapt for their states. It also quotes Cindy Jacobs, co-founder of the U.S. Reformation Prayer Network, who has been coordinating prayer efforts. Jacobs’ belief about the cause of the oil spill seems to shed some light on Gene Mills’ strange assessment (see below) of the oil gusher as the “second spiritual assault” on New Orleans:

Jacobs believes the oil spill is more than a natural disaster but partly the result of greed, debauchery on the beaches, poor environmental stewardship and a lack of U.S. support for Israel—all issues her network has been repenting of since the leak began.

‘Whenever there’s violent weather or some things like this, you have to ask if it’s just a natural disaster or if you’re reaping something that’s been sown,’ she said. ‘We feel this is a cumulative thing.’

Resume original post:

The official praying actually started on Monday, June 21, in the Memorial Hall (front lobby) of the Louisiana State Capitol, as we are informed by the Louisiana Family Forum, which distributed the governor’s official proclamation [pdf]. (Are we surprised?) According to the LFF’s June 22, 2010, Family Facts newsletter, “lawmakers, pastors, and intercessors joined Representative Regina Barrow, Senator Sharon Broome, and Governor Bobby Jindal  for a Prayer Vigil concerning the Deepwater Horizon Oil Explosion.” Also prominently featured in the LFF’s newsletter is a picture of Jindal undergoing the laying on of hands (the hands are unidentified). The Family Facts article also notes that “Governor Jindal read Psalms 146.” (See the LFF’s YouTube video of the 2007 pre-inaugural Christmas gala that LFF threw for him, at which he likewise underwent the laying on of hands in front of hundreds of attendees, with Rev. Mills presiding [at 2:17].)

It is ironic that Jindal could not squeeze into his schedule even one personal response to the Louisiana citizens, scientists, and teachers who implored him to protect the teaching of science in the state’s public schools. Yet he always seems to be available for the LFF’s political-religious photo ops, such as its 2009 Annual Legislative Awards Banquet, at which the LFF gives awards to Louisiana legislators who vote their way. So his finding room in his schedule for the prayer photo op is entirely typical of the way Jindal allots his gubernatorial time. The LFF asks, and the LFF receives. (See the Baton Rouge Advocate’s excellent June 28 editorial, “Bible Frauds on the March,” about the LFF’s power over the Louisiana legislature.)

The fact that people would turn to prayer is not surprising. Devout residents all along the Gulf Coast are understandably turning to anything they think will help. A good deal of prayer has been prompted in Louisiana in recent years by the well-known catastrophes that have blown in from the Gulf of Mexico. When people face losing everything they love, prayer is a source of hope and comfort. However, the irony of our anti-science governor signing a prayer proclamation when he would not sign his name to protect the teaching of science is a bit much. Yet it is to be expected in light of the fact that Jindal has thrown in lock, stock, and barrel with the extreme Religious Right. Vetoing the LSEA in 2008 would have meant breaking ranks with Louisiana Family Forum (LFF) director Rev. Gene Mills, who — being as much a political operative as a man of the cloth — is one of Jindal’s unofficial right-hand men. Mills orchestrated the passage of the LSEA. (See “Holy Warriors,” Jeremy Alford’s informative May 26, 2010, story on Mills and the LFF.)

As it turns out — unsurprisingly — Mills also announced that he orchestrated the drafting of the prayer proclamation (which is posted on the governor’s official website). He says that Louisianians have not prayed enough about the oil catastrophe. In his June 24, 2010, e-mail to LFF supporters, he observed that despite the fact that “America has assembled the brightest minds, the newest technology and America’s finest for 65 consecutive days to seal this breach in the Gulf of Mexico,” we have “failed to . . . corporately ‘pause and pray’ and admit that our efforts are futile without the assistance of the Almighty!” So an official proclamation from the governor was needed. (Note the additional irony of the double-entendre in Mills’s exhortation that Louisianians must “corporately” pray that God will help us get rid of BP’s oily deluge.) In a remark aimed directly at other ministers, Mills divulges that he had help in drafting the proclamation:

Pastors, I requested that Governor Jindal initiate this call and have been assisted by David Barton of Wallbuilders, Tony Perkins of Family Research Council and others in crafting the proclamation and implementing its directive.

Most readers have heard of Tony Perkins, a former Louisiana state legislator who helped found the LFF and now wages nation-wide culture war from Washington, DC, as head of the Family Research Council. (Perkins pulled some creationist shenanigans of his own during his time in the legislature.) But David Barton, a Republican political operative in Texas who poses as a historian, is less recognizable in Louisiana. Barton founded Wallbuilders, an organization devoted to “presenting America’s forgotten history and heroes with an emphasis on our moral, religious, and constitutional heritage” — in other words, he spreads Religious Right propaganda about the Founding Fathers. (Rob Boston of Americans United for Separation of Church and State exposed Barton’s pseudo-scholarship almost twenty years ago. See “Sects, Lies and Videotape: David Barton’s Distorted History.”)

Barton was one of the “expert” reviewers whom the far-right contingent of the Texas Board of Education selected to screw up the Texas history standards earlier this year. (Boston points out Barton’s “credentials” for this task: “Barton earned a bachelor’s degree in ‘Christian Education’ from Oral Roberts University in 1976 and later taught math and science at a fundamentalist Christian school founded by his father.” See also the extensive information on Barton at Texas Freedom Network’s excellent TFN Insider blog.)

It turns out that Barton is also a buddy of Bobby Jindal. He accompanied Jindal on a campaign tour of Baptist churches in North Louisiana in October 2006, after which Jindal was a guest (two days in a row) on Barton’s Wallbuilders Live! radio program. Jindal gushed to the audience about what a knowledgeable historian Barton is. (See “Governor Jindal’s Friends in Low Places” here.) So Jindal reveals that he is not only anti-science but — through his chummy association with Barton — anti-history as well. Mills’ partnering with Barton on the Louisiana prayer proclamation simply continues the close working relationship that exists among Jindal, Barton, Perkins, and Mills himself.

So Rev. Mills pulled together his divinely inspired effort to protect the Gulf Coast. Actually, ten days after the rig explosion, in his April 30, 2010, End of Week newsletter, he had already issued a call to prayer — which included a weird, ambiguous comment about a “spiritual assault” on New Orleans:

It is not coincidental that this event occurred at precisely the point Katrina tracked and struck its destructive blow to New Orleans. This second spiritual assault warrants that we “Cry Out for success in the Gulf!” [Katrina link is Mills'.]

Next, in a call for fasting as well, he provided a prayer, which, among other things, asked God to inflict the oil on someone else (look out Cuba!):

As we are led by the Holy Spirit, let us pray…

• For God’s hand upon His creation, the land, the sea, and the winds. “Father, direct and command prevailing winds to move southward. We call forth the green grass of our wetlands to thrive and flourish!” [underlining added]

Now for the final irony: Almost two months later, in his June 4 End of Week newsletter, “Drills, Spills, and Bills” (in which he updates readers on his lobbying successes at the Capitol), Mills is defending BP against the prospect of prosecution. Referring indirectly to the Obama administration’s announcement that there will be a criminal investigation, he makes no mention of the fact that eleven human beings — husbands, dads, sons, brothers, buddies — are dead because of BP — twelve if you count the recent, tragic suicide of Alabama fisherman Allen “Rookie” Kruse. And domestic violence calls have tripled in beautiful little Bayou La Batre, Alabama. (Family values, anyone?) But Mills is concerned about BP’s stock ratings:

[Obama's] policy decisions to close drilling and proceed with criminal investigations appear counter-intuitive, calculated, and politically theatrical. BP’s stock fell dramatically within minutes of the criminal investigation announcement! How will Louisiana subrogate against an [sic] bankrupt BP?

Obama has repeatedly charged BP with withholding information… does he really expect they will suddenly be forthcoming with all the latest intelligence now that their every word and action may be used against them in Congressional Investigation?  This is all a sad show for the media and the American people to avoid culpability. May God have mercy on our coast!

There isn’t much else to say after this revelation, is there? Except to recall — once again — that, under the governorship of Bobby Jindal, Gene Mills is calling the shots on Louisiana science education policy. Have mercy, indeed.

By Barbara Forrest

The title of this post may sound strange. But read on, and you will see that there is more backbone in a minority of the members of the Florida legislature than in the entire Louisiana legislature. Just as it was doing in Louisiana, the Discovery Institute, a creationist think tank in Seattle, was maneuvering in Florida to get its academic freedom (read: “stealth creationism”) legislation passed in the state of Florida in 2008. But the outcome in Florida was very different than the outcome in Louisiana. On February 29, 2008, a Discovery Institute “academic freedom” bill was introduced in the Florida Senate by Sen. Ronda Storms. That bill, SB 2962, passed. On March 4, a companion bill, HB 1483, was introduced in the House by Rep. Alan Hays. It also passed. In April, as the National Center for Science Education reported, “The antievolution bills — the so-called Academic Freedom Acts — in Florida are progressing, despite protests from teachers, scientists, and the Florida ACLU, and despite the criticisms of the legislature’s own staff.” By April 28, however, there was some doubt as to whether creationists in the Florida legislature could reconcile their own differences in time to get the bill passed before the legislature adjourned on May 2. They did not, and the legislation died. In 2009, creationists in the Florida legislature made another attempt at getting academic freedom legislation passed, but SB 2396 fortunately did not even get to the floor, and the bill died in committee. (See the excellent Florida Citizens for Science website.)

Florida seems to have learned its lesson (for the time being). The notable thing about Florida, however, was the vocal resistance to these creationist bills by Florida legislators on the debate floor of the House and Senate in 2008. (See videos below.) There was no such resistance on the floor of the Louisiana House and Senate when the Louisiana Science Education Act (LEA) was making its way through the legislature at exactly the same time as the Florida bills. In fact, where the Louisiana legislature is concerned, except for three “no” votes (pdf) in the House (which the three legislators cast without comment), there was no resistance at all.

The Florida Senate

Sen. Storms spearheaded the effort in the Florida Senate. In the video below, you will see her and a colleague, Sen. Don Gaetz, arguing for passage of the bill on the Senate floor, regurgitating the Discovery Institute’s code-language talking points. Notice that they were defending “critical analysis” in science classes. Sound familiar? Sen. Stephen Wise, another creationist representative (who sponsored the unsuccessful 2009 bill), tells his colleagues that “I just urge ya” to support the bill so that students and teachers could discuss “both sides” of the issue. Sound familiar? But you will also see Sen. Arthenia Joyner pointing out that the bill would permit introducing creationism into science classes. You will see Sen. Frederica Wilson pointing out that the bill promoted religion. Sen. Steven Geller also points out that the bill was intended to permit the teaching of intelligent design while deliberately avoiding the term “intelligent design.” Watch for yourself (2:44).

The Florida House of Representatives

Debate in the Florida House of Representatives was much the same. Discovery Institute shills repeated DI’s talking points. However, several legislators cut right through them, as you will see in the video below. You will see (at :37) Rep. Geraldine Thompson catch Rep. Hays in a lie about his bill (either he was lying or had not read his own bill). When she questioned Rep. Hays about a section of the bill that allowed students to skirt “normal testing procedures” by escaping penalties in their schoolwork for “subscribing to a particular position or view regarding biological or chemical evolution” — in other words, allowing students to write on their exams “what they believe rather than what they have been taught by their instructors” — Hays denied that this was in the amended bill. However, some minutes later, Rep. Thompson read from the engrossed bill that contained all the amendments, and, sure enough, that exemption was included. Hays, a retired dentist (shades of Texas?), should have known better than to lie to a retired college administrator and teacher whose hobby is historical research.

Later, when challenged again by another House colleague, Hays defended the bill as enabling students to engage in — here it comes! — “critical analysis” on this “lightning-rod issue.” Hays tried to fend off additional challenges from other House members. Finally, in a fit of exasperation, he fulminated on the House floor:

It’s very difficult for me to speak any more plainly than I’ve already spoken. But what this bill does is tells the teacher to go ahead and teach the theory of evolution and make sure that your students have a complete view of that theory, and [that] they know that it is only a theory. It is not gospel law. It . . . it . . . there’s no proof that any species has transitioned from one thing to another. No people have ever come from tadpoles. . . .

Hays got the rejoinder he deserved from Rep. Keith Fitzgerald (a college professor):

The sponsor of this bill told us the other day that there’s no evidence of evolution turning a fly into a monkey. But this bill shows definitively that bad bills can turn legislators into monkeys. . . .

Rep. Audrey Gibson (whose hobbies, quite appropriately, include weight training) then threw a punch of her own:

The difficulty that I have with this bill is that the sponsor seems not even to know what the definition of ‘critical analysis’ is. Well, if you can’t define a thing, then how in the world can you legislate it?

BINGO!

Hays faced similar challenges from other colleagues, Rep. Elaine Schwartz and Rep. Mary Brandenburg, who recognized full well what this law would do to Florida science education. Watch and enjoy (9:24).

Lagniappe

As lagniappe (a Louisiana word for “a little extra”), below is another video (3:22) in which Rep. Hays lies again, this time about Expelled, a Discovery Institute pro-intelligent design propaganda film that Hays, speaking from the House floor, urged his colleagues to see. Its release in Florida was timed to coincide with the legislative session — as it had been in Louisiana, but with little public awareness of it here. (Aside: Rotten Tomatoes says, “Full of patronizing, poorly structured arguments, Expelled is a cynical political stunt in the guise of a documentary.” The Internet Movie Database gave it a 3.7/10 rating. MSNBC called it “far worse than stupid.” For a real treat, read movie critic Roger Ebert’s review: “This film is cheerfully ignorant, manipulative, slanted, cherry-picks quotations, draws unwarranted conclusions, makes outrageous juxtapositions (Soviet marching troops representing opponents of ID), pussy-foots around religion (not a single identified believer among the ID people), segues between quotes that are not about the same thing, tells bald-faced lies, and makes a completely baseless association between freedom of speech and freedom to teach religion in a university class that is not about religion.”) Hays was confronted about the film by Rep. Fitzgerald: “This movie you’re talking about — is this not about being able to teach intelligent design in the schools, which you just said, in response to Rep. Gelber, is not what you’re trying to do with this bill?” Here is Hays’ reply:

No, it’s not about teaching intelligent design. It’s a documentary.

 

The same word that Judge John E. Jones III used to describe some of the defense testimony in Kitzmiller et al. v. Dover Area School District (2005) applies here: Rep. Hays’ reply was an exercise in mendacity. Only a few weeks earlier, Hays had sponsored a news conference (seen in the video above) featuring Ben Stein, the star and narrator of Expelled. Standing right behind Stein in front of the news cameras was Casey Luskin, the Discovery Institute staffer who promotes intelligent design for a living (see Casey’s press conference talking points). (See Little Green Footballs’ post about Casey. See Steve Doocy interviewing Casey on Fox News.) A few weeks later, Casey traveled all the way down to Louisiana to attend the May 21, 2008, House Education Committee hearing on the Louisiana Science Education Act — which our legislators were all too eager to pass. The Florida creationist legislators won the floor votes in the House and Senate, but they apparently couldn’t conquer their own internal disagreements in time to get the bill passed. Moreover, as seen above, they encountered loud, public, determined resistance from other legislators. At one point during, Rep. Hays questioned his fellow legislators:

“My question to you today is, what are you afraid of? Are you afraid that our students are going to learn how to critically analyze a theory? That’s what you seem to be saying. . . .

What Hays was hearing from his House colleagues who spoke out was definitely not fear. It was the sound of legislative backbones straightening up and standing up. We haven’t heard such sounds in Louisiana for . . .  gee, memory fails us here. We know what Louisiana legislators — even the half-way principled ones — were afraid of when the LSEA was coursing through the corridors of the Louisiana State Capitol:  Bobby Jindal. In the 2008 legislative session, when Jindal was newly inaugurated and still on his gubernatorial honeymoon, everyone was afraid to cross him. As it turned out, they apparently had reason to be — see Jeremy Alford, “Bobby Jindal — the Good-bye Guv.”

But with respect to Florida legislators who recognized the “academic freedom” legislation for what it truly was and spoke out against it, the thought of what they might be risking politically certainly did not intimidate them. In light of these Florida legislators’ willingness to publicly defend the teaching of science, we in Louisiana just have to ask:

Couldn’t even one Louisiana legislator have stood up publicly on the debate floor the way these Floridians did? Just one?

This website is normally devoted to providing information about the teaching of evolution and the fight against creationism in Louisiana and related topics. However, important science-related issues sometimes arise that our readers should know about. The following is one of those issues, and there is a lesson in it for Louisiana:  three Italian scientists — Elena Cattaneo of the University of Milan, Elisabetta Cerbai of the University of Florence, and Silvia Garagna of the University of Pavia — are fighting a legal battle in the Italian courts to win the right to apply for government funding of human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research, which is legal in Italy. These scientists have taken on this fight at their own expense, and they could use some help.  Their bravery in defending science is a lesson for the people of Louisiana, a state in which standing up to defend science is a actually a liability in the eyes of public officials (see also here).

Here is the background (this discussion will come back around to Louisiana — so please keep reading!): In March 2009, I had the privilege of participating in the Second World Congress for Freedom of Scientific Research in Brussels, Belgium. (Here is the abstract of my paper.) The Congress is held every two years by the Nonviolent Radical Party and the Luca Coscioni Association (LCA) for Freedom of Scientific Research, which is named in honor of its president and founder, Luca Coscioni. Mr. Coscioni died in 2006 from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) after suffering for ten years. The LCA promotes the right of scientists to do potentially lifesaving research such as hESC research. (See my July 2009 articles in the Hammond, LA, Daily Star on the LCA website. PDFs of originals here [7/24/09] and here [7/29/09].)

At the Brussels meeting, I attended presentations by scientists such as Stephen Minger, who does hESC research in the United Kingdom. Minger’s research group created the first human stem cell line in the UK, which was deposited in the UK Stem Cell Bank for the benefit of other scientists. (See “U.K. Stem Cell Policy – A Civic Scientist’s Journey through Regulation” [pdf] and Minger’s February 2009 address [video] at the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy at Rice University. This presentation is essentially the same one he gave in Brussels.)

I also heard NBC news correspondent Charles Sabine speak of his father’s tragic death from Huntington’s Disease, from which Sabine, too, will die. He just doesn’t know when it will strike him. His brother — a brilliant, Oxford-educated lawyer — has already been stricken. I had the honor of talking to Mr. Sabine during our bus ride to one of the Brussels sessions. (See the 2009 National Public Radio story on Sabine here. See also, “I Will Die the Most Horrible Death,” in the August 2009 Guardian here. See Sabine talking about his ordeal here [video also embedded at the end of this post]. See here a whole series of videos of Sabine, including his presentation of “The Legacy and the Hope: Huntington’s Disease,” which is a version of the talk he gave in Brussels.)

I also had the pleasure of meeting Dr. Elena Cattaneo, a neuroscientist who conducts stem cell research related to Huntington’s Disease. (See her appeal for contributions to fund the search for a cure here. Video also embedded at the end of this post.) Dr. Cattaneo and Charles Sabine are friends. Together they are working to get Mr. Sabine’s message to as many people as possible about the importance of human embryonic stem cell research — Sabine is literally pleading for this research to continue while he is still able to speak and to travel. While there is no guarantee that stem cell research will produce a cure for Huntington’s Disease, the potential of finding lifesaving cures for a host of genetic diseases like Huntington’s is so promising that scientists around the world are committed to it. (See this 2006 report from the National Institutes of Health. See this November 2009 article about the progress that has already been made using stem cell therapies.) But Dr. Cattaneo has a BIG problem: while hESC research is legal in Italy, the Italian government has denied her and other researchers the right to submit proposals for government research funding. Eurostemcell, a European consortium of stem cell researchers, issued a joint statement [pdf] in July 2007 concerning the obstacles to hESC in Italy:

In Italy, it is legal to work on already-established human embryonic stem (hES) cell lines from frozen discarded embryos but it is illegal to derive new hES cell lines. Our scientists stand ready and able to thrive alongside the best of our European colleagues in both human embryonic and adult stem cell research. However the legal research on hES cell lines is nullified by Italy’s public funding decisions: resources for human embryonic stem cell research are denied, allocated only to research on adult stem cells. This regulatory and funding limit hinders effective collaboration in Europe by Italian labs and runs contrary to the spirit of European funding, which expects that national resources align with European ones to promote scientific progress. . . . [F]or Italy to stay in this field of research, and to secure far reaching social and economic benefits, it must also act on Italian funding and regulation. (p. 4)

Dr. Cattaneo and her colleagues were denied the right to submit research proposals when the Italian government made available eight million euros ($10,674,745.00) for stem cell research in February 2009. So they filed suit against the government in April 2009. (See the timeline of the case.) In July 2009, the first level regional tribunal ruled against them, saying that only institutions requesting funding had the right to sue the government, not individuals. According to Dr. Cattaneo, “The verdict seems to draw inspiration from an ideology more than from the law. . . . It is also shocking that as individual scientists we do not have the right to appeal against a public call for proposals that limits our freedom to do research that is legal in our country.” The world’s leading scientific journals, Nature and Science, have both taken notice and reported on this case (see Nature July 2009 and Science July 2009).

Dr. Cattaneo and her two colleagues continued their legal challenge by appealing to the State Council, only to lose again in December 2009 when the Council re-affirmed the tribunal’s ruling that only institutions have the right to sue the government. But Drs. Cattaneo, Cerbai, and Garagna are not giving up, as they stated in their February 2010 letter [pdf] in Nature: “As scientists concerned about inappropriate political interference in scientific affairs, we intend to continue the fight through the courts, even if it takes years.” After their second loss in December, their effort may indeed take years.

The problems in Italy originate with the Vatican’s opposition to most kinds of stem cell research and its influence over Italian politicians — and thus public policy. The Church had called the European Union’s 2006 decision to fund hESC research “a twisted sense of progress” (see here). When the Vatican objected to the Italian government’s funding of hESC research in 2009, politicians changed the funding policy to accommodate its objections. Nature reported that “the exclusion was added by politicians to a text [that had been] agreed [on] by a committee of scientific experts.” This change is evidence of the Church’s power over Italian politics. In fact, Cardinal Alfonso Lopez Trujillo, head of the Pontifical Council for the Family, said in 2006 that “Excommunication will be applied to the women, doctors and researchers who eliminate embryos [and to the] politicians that approve the law.” However, Prof. Cesare Galli, of the Laboratory of Reproductive Technologies in Cremona, who was the first scientist to clone a horse, responded to this threat and mentioned his colleague, Dr. Cattaneo:

I can bear excommunication. I was raised as a Catholic, I share Catholic values, but I am able to make my own judgment on some issues and I do not need to be told by the Church what to do or to think. I will be, together with Elena Cattaneo [a scientist working in the University of Milan] the first to be affected by the excommunication and then there are two other labs that I know using imported embryonic stem cells.

Dr. Cattaneo, also a Catholic, responded in 2008 concerning criticism from the Church:

I have presented my opinions many times before, and today I choose to be even more direct: I am a Christian and I work on embryonic stem cells, in the same way as I work on adult stem cells and in other fields that do not involve the use of embryonic stem cells. I believe I am right to work on cells that are not ‘embryo’ and obtained from a blastocyst ‘that is not yet a person.’ These cells can help us understand and hopefully contribute to diminish the suffering of many. I also have the hope that there is a God bigger than any earthbound imagination, that has no need to be asserted through dogmas. A God who allows women and men to think freely, to hope, to love, to enjoy and hold their own beliefs having diverse rhythms and forms. A God who lets humanity, individually vested with consciences and ethical tensions, continue to grow (for those that are believers) the gift it has received. A God that perhaps nurtures some love for Science. Because a God who wants to keep us in the dark and in suffering probably does not exist.  [*Go here (pdf) for her entire statement, "The Reason Why I Work with Embryonic Stem Cells,"translated from Italian.]

One would think that in the face of such formidable criticism, Dr. Cattaneo and her colleagues, Dr. Cerbai  and Dr. Garagna, would be hesitant to continue their fight — especially since they are waging this battle at their own expense. But they are undaunted. According to Dr. Cattaneo, “We have a constitutional right to appeal against a public funding call that limits our freedom to do scientifically valuable research that is legal in our country.” And they are getting support from their colleagues in other countries. Austin Smith, Director of the Wellcome Trust Centre for Stem Cell Research in Cambridge, England, says, “This courageous action by three Italian scientists is a beacon to all who believe in freedom of research to advance human knowledge and understanding.”

The Luca Coscioni Association has posted a request for donations to provide reimbursements to the three scientists for their legal costs. According to the LCA,

The legal expenses for the first degree of judgement were of around 6.000,00 euro. Since the beginning of the appeal (July 7 [2009]) 7.774,79 euro (around 10.592 USD) have been raised. The three scientists have been promptly refunded (see attachments). The spare amount will help covering expenses for next step.

** Readers who would like to donate to help cover the legal expenses can do so HERE using PayPal. Any amount readers can donate will be appreciated. (This is a legitimate avenue for making the donation. Receipts of the reimbursements that have so far been given to Dr. Cattaneo and her colleagues are posted at the bottom of the page at the “HERE” link above.)

So how does all this relate to Louisiana? (Thank you for reading this far!) It highlights the fact that we have absolutely no reason to feel smug about the obstacles to scientific research in Italy — our own house is in quite a bit of disorder. Recall Stephen Minger, who helped create one of the first hESC lines in the UK. Minger recently departed King’s College London to work at GE Healthcare, where he will apply his research in the areas of drug development and toxicology. He also serves on the advisory panel of the International Stem Cell Policy Program at the prestigious James A Baker III Institute for Public Policy at Rice University. While at King’s College, Minger helped secure licensing in the UK for research in which the nucleus of a bovine ovum is replaced by a human somatic cell nucleus in an effort to create hESC lines.

The technical difficulty and ethical constraints associated with obtaining an abundant supply of human ova make this kind of research a viable alternative if it can be made to work. (Minger explains it in the video at the link above. See also “U.K. Stem Cell Policy — A Civic Scientist’s Journey Through Regulation” [pdf]. See this article for a simple explanation of the technique and the reasoning behind this process. See also “Stem Cell Basics” at the National Institutes of Health.) There is no guarantee that this research will succeed (see this February 2009 article in New Scientist). However, if it could be made to work, there would be abundant stem cell lines that could be used in research to develop cures for Parkinson’s disease, spinal cord injuries, and other conditions. Actor Christopher Reeve was well known for promoting stem cell research after his devastating spinal cord injury. The Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation now continues Reeve’s work. Louisiana residents have traveled as far as China and Portugal to obtain expensive, unproven stem cell treatments because they need a source of hope. In the video above, Charles Sabine says, “Hope is the most important word in the world. So far they [patients] have not had that hope. But we do now have the chance if we can provide the support and the resources to the researchers.” No one with a heart could disagree with him.

Now here comes the kicker:

If Stephen Minger were doing his research in Louisiana, he would go to prison for ten years.

According to section D.1.e. of Act 108, which became law in Louisiana in 2009, Minger would be in jail and would also be subject to a $10,000 fine. Among the other procedures that Act 108 prohibits (which I am not discussing here), Section D.1.e. outlaws the creation of “(e) An embryo produced by introducing a human nucleus into a nonhuman egg.” Violators, according to Act 108, “shall be imprisoned at hard labor.” Section D.1.e. outlaws exactly the same kind of research that is presently licensed in the UK. But Act 108 is not the only anti-stem cell legislation in Louisiana. One year earlier, in 2008 (the same year in which the creationist Louisiana Science Education Act [Act 473] was passed), the state also adopted Act 486, which “prohibits public funds, including tax proceeds, funds received from the federal government, or other revenues of the state or political subdivisions thereof, from being used by any person or entity, including any state-funded institution or facility, for human somatic cell nuclear transfer.” In short, like Drs. Cattaneo, Cerbai, and Garagna, Louisiana scientists cannot secure either federal or state funding for research that is legal in the United States. Readers of this blog will not be surprised to learn that the Louisiana Family Forum was behind both Act 486 (HB 370) and Act 108 (SB 115). (The LFF gave awards at its 2009 annual legislative awards banquet to legislators who supported Act 108.)

With respect to our regressive legislation in matters concerning science, Louisiana has nothing to be proud of. But those of us who disapprove of what the legislature and the governor have done to the prospects for stem cell research in Louisiana can at least show some class and do something to help these three courageous Italian scientists. We can send money to help in their legal case, and we can spread the word on their behalf.

If you do not have time to follow all the supporting hyperlinks above, please at least take the time to watch the two videos below. In the first (5:17 min.), Charles Sabine talks about the importance of hope: “Hope is the most important word in the world.” There are pictures of his father, who died from Huntington’s Disease, his brother, who presently suffers from it, and his wife Nicole and their beautiful little daughter Breezy, who fortunately does not have the HD gene. Then watch the video of Dr. Cattaneo,”We Always Need Each Other” (2:19 min.) in which she speaks of Charles Sabine’s message to the world and of the need to fund HD research.

PLEASE DONATE

Kentucky House Bill 397, a clone of the 2008 Louisiana Science Education Act, is dead.

HB 397 (BR 1517) – T. Moore, J. Carney

AN ACT relating to science education and intellectual freedom.
Create a new section of KRS Chapter 158 to encourage local district teachers and administrators to foster an environment promoting objective discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of scientific theories; allow teachers to use, as permitted by the local board of education, materials in addition to state-approved texts and instructional materials for discussion of scientific theories including evolution, the origins of life, global warming, and human cloning; clarify that provisions do not promote religious doctrine or discrimination; provide that the section may be cited as the Kentucky Science Education and Intellectual Freedom Act.

Common sense has carried the day in the Bluegrass State!

The National Center for Science Education has posted an announcement of the demise of HB 397. (Download the entire bill here [Word doc]). The bill died in the Kentucky House Education Committee, to which it had been referred on February 10. The chair of that committee is Rep. Carl Rollins. We commend the Kentucky House Education Committee for letting this bill die rather than imitating the entire Louisiana legislature, Governor Bobby Jindal, and the Louisiana State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education. They are living proof that politicians can follow principle rather than the dictates of the Religious Right — even in the Bible Belt, where Kentucky, along with Louisiana, is located.

The Discovery Institute, which is the headquarters of the intelligent design creationist movement, is heavily invested in the Louisiana legislation and the BESE policies. DI creationists helped write the LSEA and provided legal advice to the Louisiana Family Forum during the process of promoting the legislation and gutting BESE’s policies for administering it. DI staffer Casey Luskin showed up in Louisiana in May 2008 when the LA House Education Committee heard testimony on the Louisiana Science Education Act (LSEA). In March of this year, he wrote a gloating entry with an amusingly ominous headline at Evolution News & Views, DI’s news “analysis” blog:

Proliferation of Academic Freedom Bills Is Darwin Lobby’s Worst Nightmare

In this piece, Luskin used KY HB 397 as an example of how the champions of “academic freedom” legislation were scaring the bejeezus out of “the intelligentsia” who were “very worried about the prospect of teachers gaining academic freedom, as a bill presently in the Kentucky legislature would allow.” According to Luskin,

The Kentucky bill contains an excellent example of language refuting assertions from critics that these bills allow the teaching of religion: ‘This section shall not be construed to promote any religious doctrine, promote discrimination for or against a particular set of religious beliefs, or promote discrimination for or against religion or nonreligion.’ The operative language of the academic freedom bills is entirely beneficial:

• The Kentucky bill encourages teachers to ‘promote critical thinking skills, logical analysis, and open and objective discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of scientific theories being studied.’

Luskin then cites both the Ouachita Parish academic freedom policy and the LSEA as among the precedents for the proposed Kentucky legislation, asserting that “it isn’t just academic freedom legislation from the past three years that’s calling for critiques of evolution in the classroom”:

• Ouachita Parish, Louisiana: ‘[T]he teaching of some scientific subjects, such as biological evolution, the chemical origins of life, global warming, and human cloning, can cause controversy … [T]eachers shall be permitted to help students understand, analyze, critique, and review in an objective manner the scientific strengths and weaknesses of existing scientific theories pertinent to the course being taught.’

(In November 2006, Louisiana Family Forum operative Darrell White persuaded the Ouachita Parish School Board to adopt its own “academic freedom” policy [pdf], which served as the template for SB 561 before it was revised as SB 733 and adopted as the LSEA. The Discovery Institute applauded the move.)

And finally — ta-da! — Luskin invokes the Louisiana Science Education Act:

And then of course there’s Louisiana 2008 Science Education Act, which requires that Louisiana schools shall ‘create and foster an environment…that promotes critical thinking skills, logical analysis, and open and objective discussion of scientific theories being studied including, but not limited to, evolution, the origins of life, global warming, and human cloning.’

And to think that the Louisiana legislature and Bobby Jindal literally handed the Discovery Institute this bragging point. At least the Kentucky House Education Committee had better sense.

If you have any friends in Kentucky, shoot them an e-mail and congratulate them. Their House Education Committee placed the interests of the children of Kentucky above the interests of the legislators who are shilling for creationists.

These interviews are posted so that Louisiana citizens will know that what has happened here has captured the attention of our fellow citizens around the country. They support us, but they are dumbfounded that Louisiana has once again passed creationist legislation after having precipitated the U. S. Supreme Court decision, Edwards v. Aguillard (1987) with the passage of the “Balanced Treatment for Creation-Science and Evolution-Science Act” in 1981.

REMINDER: Readers with information that creationist materials are being used in Louisiana public school science classes should contact the Louisiana Coalition for Science.

As the new decade begins in 2010, “Top Ten” lists  are a popular way to commemorate the events of 2009, and science is well-represented in the list-making. Wired Science lists the “Top Scientific Breakthroughs of 2009.” The Examiner lists the “Top 10 Science Stories of 2009.” Scientific American has posted a slideshow of “The Top 10 Science Stories of 2009.” ScienceNOW, a website by the American Association for the Advancement of Science for publishing breaking science news , has listed “The Top 10 ScienceNOWs of 2009.” National Geographic News lists the “Top Ten Videos of 2009: Nat Geo News’s Most Watched.” And Religion Dispatches lists its “Top Ten Religion & Science Stories.” Louisiana closes out 2009 by being on two “Top Ten” lists, but these are lists on which the citizens of Louisiana should be embarrassed to be included. Virtually all of the above lists include stories that highlight important discoveries related to evolution. Louisiana, however, made it onto these two lists for its attack on the teaching of evolution.

• The National Center for Science Education has posted its “Top Ten Evolution/Creationism Stories of the Year.” Louisiana is NCSE’s story #5, which highlights (using hyperlinks) the Louisiana Family Forum‘s commandeering of both the policy and the complaint process related to implementation of the 2008 Louisiana Science Education Act:

5. Louisiana faces “academic freedom” In 2008, the Louisiana Science Education Act was signed into law, which opened the door to teaching creationism in public school science classes. Since then, the state board of education has ignored the recommendations of its own science education professionals, turning instead to the Louisiana Family Forum for guidance. Under the board’s guidelines, supplementary classroom materials can’t be rejected just because they include creationism. And challenging the materials triggers a convoluted hearing process that the Louisiana Coalition for Science calls “seriously flawed.”

“A mixed result in Louisiana”

“More bad news from Louisiana”

Louisiana coverage

(See LCFS articles about this here and here.) (NOTE: Readers who value good science education can begin 2010 by joining NCSE, which is the only organization devoted solely to protecting the teaching of evolution from creationist attacks. Disclosure: I serve on the NCSE Board of Directors.)

• Lauri Lebo, a journalist who provided excellent coverage of the trial in the case of Kitzmiller et al. v. Dover Area School District (2005) and who published a book about the trial, has included Louisiana as #3 in the list she compiled for Religion Dispatches.

3. Just Say No . . . To Louisiana The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology (SICB), one of the nation’s leading scientific societies, took the unusual step in February to boycott Louisiana due to the state’s new anti-science law. In 2008, lawmakers voted to pass the Science Education Act, which was signed into law by Gov. Bobby Jindal. The law, based largely on wording from the pro-intelligent design Discovery Institute’s sample academic freedom bill, explicitly says that teachers are permitted to use supplemental materials to teach critiques of evolution and opens the door to teaching creationism and intelligent design. In response, SICB chose to hold its annual conference in Utah, whose state Board of Education recently passed a resolution recognizing that “the Theory of Evolution is a major unifying concept in science.”

Looking at the bright side, Louisiana is blessed with dedicated public school science teachers and accomplished scientists. Readers around the state should (1) let your science teachers know that you support teaching evolution and thank them for their efforts to teach good science, and (2) inform your school board members that you will be watching them to make sure that they do not allow creationist materials into our public school science classes. As always, if you learn that such materials are being used, please contact the Louisiana Coalition for Science.